Or in layman's terms:You know, I actually want to see the GOP take on violent videogames and make that a big issue. Just imagine the most toxic, cancerous elements of the gaming community turning all their malicious trolling on the Republicans. Imagine how badly that would go for both sides.
Maybe that deserves an accurate rewrite:Raindrops on roses
And whiskers on kittens
Bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens
Brown paper packages tied up with strings
Cream-colored ponies and crisp apple strudels
Doorbells and sleigh bells
And schnitzel with noodles
Wild geese that fly with the moon on their wings
Girls in white dresses with blue satin sashes
Snowflakes that stay on my nose and eyelashes
Silver-white winters that melt into springsThese are a few of the things that cause school shootings
He was testing Wal-Mart's commitment to the second amendment. Should have listened to his wife, and sister who both told him not to fucking do that!Didn't a man don body armour and an assault rifle walk into a WalMart yesterday prompting an evacuation?
Consider the just-as-real bullet proof/resistant backpacks, I can't really blame the store. Blame your society, which is grown so crooked and bad that buying a gun for your kid to take to school is not just accepted but afvised behavior.
@HCGLNS I think this is what you heard about : https://www.firefighternation.com/articles/2019/08/armed-firefighter-stops-armed-man-at-missouri-walmart.htmlYeah, but I don't get the evacuation. He's a good guy with a gun who will save everybody when a bad guy with a gun starts shooting up the place.
Unfortunately that article is missing the "how and why", which @mikerc posted a few spots above this:
I'm not sure, since my last math class was so long ago, but i think 2 good guys with a gun cancel each other out...Unfortunately that article is missing the "how and why", which @mikerc posted a few spots above this:
Shooter was "testing commitment to 2nd Amendment "
So, basically you've got a guy who literally came there to stir up shit, and as I've seen other people speculate, the "good guy with a gun" could be sued because this idiot was supposedly within his open carry rights. It's a fucked up situation all around.
EDIT: sorry, phone is being extra stupid today.
But is he training them to return fire? The only way to stop shooters is a "Good Boy! with a gun".Literally anything to prevent people from giving up their murder-toys.
You're not wrong.I'd hate to say it but... any design that makes it harder for the gun to do his job is going to make it harder for response to do it's job too.
Especially since the current strategy for these things seems to be to wait and see if they kill themselves and only go in if they must.You're not wrong.
I mean, if you build a fortress to keep people out, then by definition you're going to have a harder time dislodging anyone who DOES manage to make it inside.