Oh yeah, I thought that went without saying. The original asshole who posted the comparison has zero right to say what women can and can't do with their hair.So I don't want to interrupt all the short hair is attractive conversation, but the point was that it doesn't matter what anyone, including you, thinks is attractive. "This person is wrong because actually that's hot" is not a rebuttal, that person is just wrong, period, because no one is obligated to appear or present the way you or anyone else deems 'hot'.
Ok, soapbox over, you can go back to posting pics of cute haircuts.
Yup. That was my same point, essentially.So I don't want to interrupt all the short hair is attractive conversation, but the point was that it doesn't matter what anyone, including you, thinks is attractive. "This person is wrong because actually that's hot" is not a rebuttal, that person is just wrong, period, because no one is obligated to appear or present the way you or anyone else deems 'hot'.
Ok, soapbox over, you can go back to posting pics of cute haircuts.
Because incels, by definition, aren't single by choice. "Incel" is short for "involuntary celibate." As in, they're not choosing to be single but blaming everyone else for it.Why is it that every INCEL I've ever heard of has made a very voluntary and specific choice to be celibate by choosing to be weird angry repulsive creatures? Shouldn’t they just be called VOLCELs?
They can only be called an "incel" if they're coming from the reasoning that they deserve/are owed having someone get into their pants, otherwise they're just "unfuckable."Why is it that every INCEL I've ever heard of has made a very voluntary and specific choice to be celibate by choosing to be weird angry repulsive creatures? Shouldn’t they just be called VOLCELs?
I understand their claim but I don’t believe their claim is correct. Like I said everyone of them voluntarily became the weird off putting creatures they are.Because incels, by definition, aren't single by choice. "Incel" is short for "involuntary celibate." As in, they're not choosing to be single but blaming everyone else for it.
Which says everything about their thinking. God forbid they try even a modicum of self-reflection to realize "Oh, I might be the problem here."
--PatrickNew College spokesperson Nathan March said, after the Sarasota Herald-Tribune reported on the book dump, that the college undertook a routine "weeding" of its campus library and many of these also were damaged by flooding during Tropical Storm Debby. Video of the dumpster did show some books with water damage. The GDC books were removed because the gender studies program was abolished by the new board of trustees last year. They were placed behind the library, near the dumpster.
--PatrickThe Taliban published a host of new “vice and virtue” laws last week, approved by their supreme leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, which state that women must completely veil their bodies – including their faces – in thick clothing at all times in public to avoid leading men into temptation and vice.
Women’s voices are also deemed to be potential instruments of vice and so will not be allowed to be heard in public under the new restrictions. Women must also not be heard singing or reading aloud, even from inside their houses.
[...]
From now on, Afghan women are also not allowed to look directly at men they are not related to by blood or marriage, and taxi drivers will be punished if they agree to drive a woman who is without a suitable male escort.
It's definitely the type of thing I was thinking about when I made the thread.Probably not what people expect this thread to be about, but it is still an issue of gender, and so it gets posted here.
School district boards up ‘surveillance windows’ it put in gender-neutral bathroomsSchools in the South Western School District of Pennsylvania are adding windows into the restrooms.
"Parents are left feeling 'uncomfortable' after a Central PA school board decided to make some alterations to a middle school bathroom. In August, the South Western School Board approved an $8,700 project to 'increase oversight of wash area and enhance stall privacy.' However, photos of that construction project have circulated the internet, leaving some parents and students 'uncomfortable' and 'horrified'. "
View attachment 49586
How the hell does this "enhance stall privacy"?
Why do they feel the need to spy on students using the bathroom? Because this is a gender inclusive bathroom, and conservatives obsessed with the genitals of teens want to spy on transgender students.