The Zoe Quinn sex-for-reviews scandal

You know who I wish we had more of as far as females in gaming? More like Roberta Williams and Jane Jensen. Williams co-founded Sierra and was instrumental in making a lot of headway in PC gaming.
Didn't Williams write like every Kings Quest game?

I just looked this up. She wrote all of Kings Quest, Laura Bow, Shivers, Phantasmagoria, and has a Facebook game coming out called Odd Manor. How more people don't know about her is kind of a crime.
 
You people? Fuck off for even comparing me to those assholes who think it's okay to send them vitriol, post naked pictures of them, or threaten to rape/kill them. I may think Quinn is scum and Sarkesian is a hack, but that's a far cry from DOING anything to them. They have every right to try and produce their content and voice their message and no one should stop them... but pointing out that they've been involved in a lot unethical shit that's helped their careers isn't harassment, it's fair judgement, especially with the rather hefty amount of evidence we've been given.

How they got where they are is suspicious and worthy of investigation. What is being done TO them is monstrous. But this isn't a two-sided issue and I'm not suddenly some MRA wackjob who wants them dead because I think we could find better women to represent gaming.
You're just a big fan of putting words in people's mouth today, aren't you. Reread my statement. I said that what you personally don't get is that we aren't trying to make these women out to be heroes. I never came close to comparing anyone in this thread to the people who are sending death threats and such.[DOUBLEPOST=1410720501,1410720366][/DOUBLEPOST]I also forget that every person on the internet is a paragon of virtue who has never EVER advanced their career or furthered their own goals in ethically questionable ways.

The amount of cognitive dissonance correction in this thread is off the charts.
 
I also forget that every person on the internet is a paragon of virtue who has never EVER advanced their career or furthered their own goals in ethically questionable ways.

The amount of cognitive dissonance correction in this thread is off the charts.
Bowie, I respect you, but I think you are starting to let your emotions cloud your reasoning. First of all, no one here is saying death threats and violence are the answer to anything. All we are saying is the few idiots that are doing that shouldn't give unethical promotion a free pass.

Second, I am a bit dumbfounded you are now arguing cognitive dissonance in a paragraph like that. I don't want to put words in your mouth, so please enlighten me what you meant by the first sentence? Are you telling me to "get over it" because people have and always will further their own goals in ethically questionable ways? Isn't part of Anita's biggest arguments that we SHOULDN'T just give in and accept the status quo when it comes to female representation in gaming? That we shouldn't just sweep it under the rug as "the usual"?

So what should we do? Accept the status quo because "it happens" or actually voice our opinions on possible unethical practices?
 
You know what, you are right. I'm letting this thread piss me off, so I'm going to bow out.[DOUBLEPOST=1410723047,1410722946][/DOUBLEPOST]I think Scythe's post would apply to Ashburner just as much as me, though.
 
I think Scythe's post would apply to Ashburner just as much as me, though.
I won't say there is not some cognitive dissonance on both sides, but this issue is complex, and unless one of us is psychic none of us will know the truth, only what we hear through reports and our own bias. I know I hold some bias, I openly admit it, but it does not mean I shouldn't be allowed to discuss it in some manner, and neither should others.

I should stress that I used to agree with Anita. I still feel female representation and the "good ole boys" club was (and still is) horrible. I want more female developers. I want more games with strong female protagonists. The problem is the internet likes to look at itself as black and white. You are either FOR Anita's message or you are the enemy, and vise versa to those that hate Anita, you agree with her, you are a fem-nazi. I lost faith in Anita when her videos felt like they were pandering to her audience by digging up anything that could even have a hint of misogyny. It makes one side rage for abolishment of all forms of sexuality in gaming and the other throw out death threats because "they taking away our boobies". Nothing gets done.

I want female voices that explain, but don't pander. I want female developers that make a name for themselves without cheating the system with their boobs (either through sex or "victimhood"). It's not black and white and shouldn't be treated as such. Neither side should hold the broom.
 
I also forget that every person on the internet is a paragon of virtue who has never EVER advanced their career or furthered their own goals in ethically questionable ways.
Hey! I am a person on the internet who has never EVER advanced my career in ethically questionable ways!

In fact, I have never advanced my career. So there!
 
Hey folks, let's all get along. We can use my body to make this happen.

*unzips*

/Whispers

Green light me
 
This commenter pretty much sums up my reaction opinion on the matter.

"My only problem with "objectification" (bad use of the word considering what I'll be using as an example) is when it breaks immersion. When there is no particular reason for a character to be dressed like an idiot (no matter the gender or body type of said character) it completely destroys my immersion.
It's most glaring when men are dressed in battle armor while women are dressed in metal bikinis. It's just weird. I'm not yelling sexism, I just want this stuff to follow some sort of basic logic. Not saying sex is bad, not saying nudity is bad, I'm saying that being overly impractical just to show off abs or butt is silly and I wont be able to take a game seriously if it does that.
I know how most people reading this site feel on "feminist"-issues and I want to definitely make sure to say that I think the "games are sexist"-circlejerk goes overboard all the time and I agree that games do not cause sexism.
All I'm saying is that dressing people like people in a game makes it easier for me to see them as people. If they dress differently than people would in real life, explain the culture of the universe and tell me what makes them do so."[DOUBLEPOST=1410812786,1410812657][/DOUBLEPOST]
Also that article is a total opinion piece not based off of any science or research. I do know that research in this area is being done, but it's all in the early stages. The effects of violence in video games can not be transitively linked to sexual portrayals.

Addendum: I also want to make one thing perfectly clear, I'm in no way saying that Sarkesian is some sort of paragon of virtue and that she's not as biased as anyone else involved in the discussion, but I'm glad she's there to promote the discussion. As with anyone, if you try to look at them with an objective eye, has some good points and some bad points and yes, she has made some errors. What I find irksome is the witch huntery that's involved.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
It is indeed an opinion piece. Sorry if my terse transcription of the article's title made it seem I was posting "proof."
 
His central tenet is not as well established as he asserts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_controversies#Scientific_debate

The American Psychological Association released an official statement in 2005, which said that:
  • There appears to be evidence that exposure to violent media increases feelings of hostility, thoughts about aggression, suspicions about the motives of others, and demonstrates violence as a method to deal with potential conflict situations.
  • Comprehensive analysis of violent interactive video game research suggests such exposure increases aggressive behavior, thoughts, angry feelings, physiological arousal, and decreases helpful behavior.
  • Studies suggest that sexualized violence in the media has been linked to increases in violence towards women, rape myth acceptance and anti-women attitudes.
And that the APA:
  • Advocates reduction of all violence in videogames and interactive media marketed to children and youth.
  • That research should be made regarding the role of social learning, sexism, negative depiction of minorities, and gender on the effects of violence in video games and interactive media on children, adolescents, and young adults.
  • That it engages those responsible for developing violent video games and interactive media in addressing the issue that playing violent video games may increase aggressive thoughts and aggressive behaviors in children, youth, and young adults, and that these effects may be greater than the well documented effects of exposure to violent television and movies.
  • That it recommends to the entertainment industry that the depiction of the consequences of violent behavior be associated with negative social consequences.
  • That it supports a rating system that accurately reflects the content of video games and interactive media.
The statement is pending revision in 2014.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_controversies#cite_note-49
That said, effects are probably short-lived and do not necessarily generalize to sexual attitudes (though it wouldn't be surprising if they did).
 

fade

Staff member
Awareness works. As an anecdote, I can tell you I never thought twice about some of the stupid sexist stuff in video games and comics. Now it's obvious, and even repulsive. Like the infamous simultaneous boobs-butt pose. I notice it everywhere now, and I don't find it attractive anymore at all. I won't lie: I did find it attractive, but now it just looks like so much meat on display.
 
Awareness works. As an anecdote, I can tell you I never thought twice about some of the stupid sexist stuff in video games and comics. Now it's obvious, and even repulsive. Like the infamous simultaneous boobs-butt pose. I notice it everywhere now, and I don't find it attractive anymore at all. I won't lie: I did find it attractive, but now it just looks like so much meat on display.
A big example of that is the current attitudes towards smoking.
 
Didn't Williams write like every Kings Quest game?

I just looked this up. She wrote all of Kings Quest, Laura Bow, Shivers, Phantasmagoria, and has a Facebook game coming out called Odd Manor. How more people don't know about her is kind of a crime.
She had more than a little influence with Torin's Passage, too.

--Patrick
 
Didn't Williams write like every Kings Quest game?

I just looked this up. She wrote all of Kings Quest, Laura Bow, Shivers, Phantasmagoria, and has a Facebook game coming out called Odd Manor. How more people don't know about her is kind of a crime.
I played a lot of Williams' games on the old apple2+ back in the day. But her heydey was 30 years ago and the internet's got a short memory sometimes. I never gave a second thought to the fact that the games had a female designer listed on the box (though in those days, it was more likely to be a ziploc bag with a cardstock graphic and a disk inside). But I'm pretty sure that in the late 80's the computer game playing demographic was a lot different than it is today.
 
Last edited:
This is why it's so hard to discuss it. Because of the fucktards threatening her and hacking her friends, any actual, valid criticism or issues with unethical promotion can just be drowned out. Soon you are lumped with those asshats because you are not willing to take everything she says at face value after all the other lies.

Oddly that post on Cracked made me more annoyed with her, not because I think she should live through that, she shouldn't, no matter how unethical she may be. It's that damn ending where she is like "Haha look at me I got my name in with Tim Shaefer and Will Weaton, BOOM" that just reminds me how she takes advantage of her victimhood to promote her own career just like her game.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
It's that damn ending where she is like "Haha look at me I got my name in with Tim Shaefer and Will Weaton, BOOM" that just reminds me how she takes advantage of her victimhood to promote her own career just like her game.
LOOKING AT ME, I R GAME DEVELOPER

 
This is why it's so hard to discuss it. Because of the fucktards threatening her and hacking her friends, any actual, valid criticism or issues with unethical promotion can just be drowned out. Soon you are lumped with those asshats because you are not willing to take everything she says at face value after all the other lies.

Oddly that post on Cracked made me more annoyed with her, not because I think she should live through that, she shouldn't, no matter how unethical she may be. It's that damn ending where she is like "Haha look at me I got my name in with Tim Shaefer and Will Weaton, BOOM" that just reminds me how she takes advantage of her victimhood to promote her own career just like her game.
And conversely, by milking her victimhood, engaging in said unethical practices, and using protective measures to squelch valid criticism AND competition, she makes it very hard to defend the valid points that she and others like her have made. There ARE problems in the industry, but bringing them up now makes you automatically perceived as supporting someone whose own conduct is suspect, whether you do or not.
 
Top