If you were on the jury, how would you find in the trial of Casey Anthony?

Please vote for two items: select one of the top two options, and one of the bottom two options.

  • Casey is guilty

    Votes: 13 100.0%
  • Casey is not guilty

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Casey will be found guilty

    Votes: 3 23.1%
  • Casey will be found not guilty

    Votes: 3 23.1%

  • Total voters
    13
Status
Not open for further replies.
the point is what the hell does that have to do with this thread?
I was just explaining partially why I was so flippant towards it. I feel guilty about the abortion joke since it's in pretty poor taste (albeit kinda funny). I don't honestly support killing children. :(
Added at: 15:49
What it means is that if you truly subscribe to the "One Thing All Humanity Should Focus On To the Exclusion Of All other things" fallacy then you wouldn't be yapping away here, you'd be saving the world from the One Thing you so dearly worry about.
If one person reads my post and thinks "you know what, the war on drugs is pretty fucked up! Maybe I should look into it a little!" then it will help. But whatever, I'm dropping it here.
 
If one person reads my post and thinks "you know what, the war on drugs is pretty fucked up! Maybe I should look into it a little!" then it will help. But whatever, I'm dropping it here.
I understand that. But everything we talk about here is not as important as the war on drugs. You might as well pop into every thread and note that it's stupid to chat about lame things because, hey, there are people dying and the world is ignoring it.

My point is that as human beings we are capable of thinking about more than one thing. Just because the war on drugs may be a bigger issue doesn't mean we should ignore everything else until it's solved. It would be like saying that you should only brush your teeth - because even though flossing helps and it would be good to do both things, brushing is better, and so we should forget about flossing until we no longer have need to brush.

Why can't we discuss the murder of a child in Florida in one thread, and the mass murders of innocent people caught up in the drug trade wars in Mexico in another thread? Why is it important to demean people who are caught up in a story that has been media whipped for years?

 
Anyway. Casey is a nitwit, and I believe she murdered her daughter in cold blood. However, I know I am a victim of media sensationalization, so if I were asked to decide her fate, knowing what little I know, I would not be able to push the button that starts the lethal injections.
 
C

Chibibar

Anyway. Casey is a nitwit, and I believe she murdered her daughter in cold blood. However, I know I am a victim of media sensationalization, so if I were asked to decide her fate, knowing what little I know, I would not be able to push the button that starts the lethal injections.
I think that is part of the strategy really. Can a juror feel comfortable enough to issue a death sentence (in this case Casey would have died if she was guilty) So that is also a factor.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Anyway. Casey is a nitwit, and I believe she murdered her daughter in cold blood. However, I know I am a victim of media sensationalization, so if I were asked to decide her fate, knowing what little I know, I would not be able to push the button that starts the lethal injections.
That's ok. I'm sure someone could fill in for you.
 
The fact is, she's still going for the false statements to police and perjury, which are felonious in their own right.

And people associated with hurting children tend to not do so well in prison...
 
The fact is, she's still going for the false statements to police and perjury, which are felonious in their own right.

And people associated with hurting children tend to not do so well in prison...
She can only get up to four years (one year for each of four counts) and unless she's given all four years, she may be sentenced to time served, though it would surprised me if she was sentenced to less than the full amount. I don't know how much of the last 3 years she actually spent in prison, and how much of the ankle monitoring would count towards the sentence. We'll find out tomorrow, I suppose.
 
M

makare

Hmm I don't know her defense might get pretty low sentences on perjury because as is she isn't a murderer by law. She is just the mother of a daughter who was murdered. She is a sympathetic perpetrator. I don't know if she has a record but if I were her defense I would be talking about her lack of record and how distraught anyone would be in a situation like that.

Jiarn below says she has a record so I would leave that out then lol
 
Let's assume that she ACTUALLY is only guilty of that felony fucking-with-the-police charge. IN FACT, there are people in the world that are only guilty of things sentenced to 2-10 years or whatever.

In what world is the systematic rape, abuse, and dehumanization associated with our prison system an acceptable punishment for that crime? I agree that she should go to prison for that, as should everyone convicted! But they don't deserve the house of horrors that is the American prison system.

I don't even think murderers deserve that, but whatever I'm just a hippy like that. :)
 
the house of horrors that is the American prison system.
Read http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/3040/rape-in-us-prisons and then give me research that shows that US prisons are as horrible as "they" say they are. The link above suggests rape happens, but not to the degree many seem to suggest, but doesn't speak towards any other forms of torture that are going on.

And I'm asking you this honestly - I really don't know. Movies and popular media portray prison as disease infested caste castles of systematic torture, but I know a few people who have been to prison, and they just laugh when they see such portrayals or hear others discuss them. Interestingly they won't tell me that it's better or worse - just different, with no further explanation. I'm sure it depends greatly on a variety of factors.

I dunno, so enlighten me.
 
My brother in law said prison sucked, unsurprisingly, but said it's not like what you see in the movies. Shocking, I know, because if we can't trust Hollywood to get it right who can we trust?
 
I had no idea about any of this until steinman made this thread. So I say: what.

Another small thing, a reason I'm a little flippant about this is that it's another example of everyone going apeshit over one white baby dying. People need to get mad about all the people dying in Mexico in drug wars that can be avoided if our government wasn't trying its damnedest to jail so many brown people and demonizing all the drugs that aren't accepted in white america. [/derail]
Babies are killed everyday. So are Mexicans. And lots of other people of varying ages, nationalities, etc.

Why are people pissed about this in particular? Because it seems like fucking up by the court system, and it's been publicized so people will know about it. Courts fuck up daily, but for those with TVs, it's been in their homes, and people care about that.

I've only known one other person in my years on the internet who was so incredibly dense as to what affects people psychologically or emotionally, or had such a hard time wrapping his head around how the world runs (whether that be good, bad, or a mixture of the two).

Go watch another movie; you understand them better and I'm sure they understand you.
 
I didn't follow the case, and honestly I'm not too interested in it. But it seems like it was a case with mostly circumstantial evidence (which doesn't make it bad evidence, it's just not conclusive in and of itself) and way too much media focus on it. If the prosecution didn't convince the jury, it doesn't mean she's innocent - it means they didn't present a strong enough case to convict. And in all honestly, I don't mind that it can be difficult to convict people. There's a reason we have juries instead of leaving it up to lynch mobs. I don't believe that the woman is innocent of wrongdoing, but I can accept that she wasn't convicted of murder.
 
I know absolutely nothing about this case except that it has been in the news a lot as of late. Shame I didn't get picked as a juror.

--Patrick
 
The fact is, she's still going for the false statements to police and perjury, which are felonious in their own right.

And people associated with hurting children tend to not do so well in prison...
"Casey Anthony will be back in court Thursday for sentencing on four misdemeanor counts of lying to police. Each count carries a maximum sentence of one year in county jail. The judge has the option of sentencing Anthony consecutively or concurrently. Anthony will receive credit for time served in jail since her 2008 arrest, meaning she could walk free."
SOURCE: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/...8.html#s303664&title=Orange_County_Courthouse

not trying to stir the pot, but apparently not, Thursday will show if real shit will be lost by the collective masses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top