Copyright Law Explained by Disney Characters

[Enresshou]

Had to watch this for a class, thought you guys might get a kick out of it

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo#:1lst5pp2][/youtube:1lst5pp2]

 

That is a really cute idea but I could only watch a couple of minutes before it got kinda irritating.

 

[CynicismKills]

Watched the first part, and it's funny. Hard to follow after awhile though, since it's so cut up.

 

[Frank]

God, that is fucking annoying to watch.

 

[Twitch]

I can't believe I sat through that.

 

[Silvanesti]

I couldn't understand a lot of it.

 

[Hylian]

I sat through the whole thing but it got really annoying after a few minutes

 

[Silvanesti]

It was like a ransom note with video

 

[Rob King]

Ow. I think I just strained my persistence of vision.

 

[Aisaku]

Found it ... Although it's a bit hard to understand at times it's amazing the amount of work put into it.

 

[redapples]

I always thought it interesting that Great Ormond Street Hospital got rights to Peter Pan until 2007 but Walt Disney get rights for their film and merchandise for ever. Anyway I enjoyed it and found it not at all difficult to watch.

 

[Rob King]

I always thought it interesting that Great Ormond Street Hospital got rights to Peter Pan until 2007 but Walt Disney get rights for their film and merchandise for ever. Anyway I enjoyed it and found it not at all difficult to watch.

Disney is everything that is wrong with copyright law. Well ... maybe not everything, but they irritate me just the same.

Also, in Canada, I'm fairly certain that parody is not fair use. So in the States, I think you could make fun of the Mickey Mouse image, and it's okay. But in Canada, it's sue-able.