London Olympics

Status
Not open for further replies.
AND HCGLNS WINS THE GOLD FOR SPOILING OLYMPIC EVENTS!!!

I mean really, Batman has been out for 3 weeks and we still spoiler that crap. The game is not over on TV now, but it is just fine to give away the ending.
 
So a team that has gone undefeated in 3 straight olympics winning the gold is a spoiler?

What are waiting for? tomorrows newspaper or next weeks Sports Illustrated?
 
Considering for those that can't watch on computer live, and it's airing currently on NBC's evening telecast, maybe waiting another hour would have been good.
 
AND HCGLNS WINS THE GOLD FOR SPOILING OLYMPIC EVENTS!!!

I mean really, Batman has been out for 3 weeks and we still spoiler that crap. The game is not over on TV now, but it is just fine to give away the ending.
I've avoided Batman spoilers by not going into messageboard threads about Batman until after I've seen it. You could probably apply that same philosophy here.
 
Considering for those that can't watch on computer live, and it's airing currently on NBC's evening telecast, maybe waiting another hour would have been good.
Considering 90% of the world saw it live and every news outlet *including* NBC posted results all over the internet as soon as it happened, the onus is on the viewer to avoid "spoilers".
 
So a team that has gone undefeated in 3 straight olympics winning the gold is a spoiler?

What are waiting for? tomorrows newspaper or next weeks Sports Illustrated?
Till right the fuck now, they just finished the match on NBC[DOUBLEPOST=1344477025][/DOUBLEPOST]
Considering 90% of the world saw it live and every news outlet *including* NBC posted results all over the internet as soon as it happened, the onus is on the viewer to avoid "spoilers".
We only have one person here that has given out spoilers twice.
 
If we are going to post open spoilers in this thread, please ask the OP to change the thread title to include "SPOILERS".

Otherwise please follow the forum rule #13:

13. Spoilers. A "spoiler" is a statement or piece of information that gives away information about the story of a book or film. An Ambush Spoiler is a spoiler in a thread which does not use our spoiler tag in a thread that has not been marked as having spoilers. There is a certain statute of limitations on what can and cannot be spoilered. Things which are common knowledge (IE: Darth Vader is Luke Skywalker's father, Hamlet dies at the end of the play, etc.) can safely be left unspoilered. Basically if it's over a year old it should be safe.
It doesn't matter if other news sources or forums post spoilers - you can't use the excuse that since other places do it, then it's acceptable at Halforums despite the rules. Please don't be mean about it and insist that they are at fault for stumbling upon your ambush spoilers. Everyone should know and understand that NBC delays the actual races for many events for US viewers.

It's a spoiler. Change the thread title, create a new thread, or spoiler tag your spoilers. Those are your options, and if you choose not to follow them, you are breaking the forum rules. To do so and rub it in someone's face is the height of arrogance.

Alternately, ask Dave to change the rules so people can openly post spoilers.
 
NBC has decided that if you aren't a beach volleyballer, your efforts tonight are unworthy of attention. They cut the prime time short by an hour to pip the new Matthew Perry sitcom. Turned that off after about 5 minutes. Then the late night show opens with 10 minutes of a jimmy Fallon bit that was crap after 5 seconds.

Going to look for proxies and VPNs when I get home to get away from NBC.
 

Dave

Staff member
Well, even though the closing ceremonies are tomorrow night and this is probably a bit of a moot point....but why not let's keep the event winners spoilered for now if we want to talk about them.
 
If we are going to post open spoilers in this thread, please ask the OP to change the thread title to include "SPOILERS".

Otherwise please follow the forum rule #13:



It doesn't matter if other news sources or forums post spoilers - you can't use the excuse that since other places do it, then it's acceptable at Halforums despite the rules. Please don't be mean about it and insist that they are at fault for stumbling upon your ambush spoilers. Everyone should know and understand that NBC delays the actual races for many events for US viewers.

It's a spoiler. Change the thread title, create a new thread, or spoiler tag your spoilers. Those are your options, and if you choose not to follow them, you are breaking the forum rules. To do so and rub it in someone's face is the height of arrogance.

Alternately, ask Dave to change the rules so people can openly post spoilers.

Sorry, according to those self-same rules:
information about the story of a book or film
This is neither. Technically, it's not a spoiler under that rule. You could argue the forum rule needs updating, of course, but at the moment, it's perfectly fine.[DOUBLEPOST=1344514713][/DOUBLEPOST]Also,
"Everyone should know and understand that NBC delays the actual races for many events for US viewers."
is a crappy, crappy defense. I didn't know that until I was told in this self same thread. Does the same hold true for other shows and other countries? 'Cause the last season House still hasn't aired here in Belgium - and neither the first nor second season of Game of Thrones, for that matter. Those are tv shows (also not covered by the rule as currently stated), and those threads are spoiled to hell and back.[DOUBLEPOST=1344514905][/DOUBLEPOST]To be perfectly clear; I'm not saying we should all be dicks to each other. I'm just saying that rule lawyering with a rule that isn't applicable is silly :p
 
Oh, any compassion we were getting from the rest of the world was gone within 3 years, not 8.
I meant internally actually... and even then it was less then 8...

That's some charlie level delusion right there. The military WANTS embedded journalists from military-hostile media sources? What a laugh.
Military hostile media in the US... let me guess, anyone questioning something the military does qualifies...

But i was mostly talking about how the when and where of those embeddings are dictated by the military itself.


Simple, catchy and quick. Call it grade school if you want, it got results. And we didn't have a monopoly on dehumanizing our enemies, either. I seem to recall reading all kinds of demeaning caricatures from nearly all the major players in that war and pretty much every war.
Actually the Brits at least seem to have used mostly positive reinforcement stuff (or they're really good at hiding it from wikipedia): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_propaganda_during_World_War_II (of course they couldn't really do any racial caricatures of the germans for obvious reasons).

As for results, keeping up morale while being bombed every day >>>> buying war bonds...


Of course not all your propaganda was bad, this is good:




But a lot of it was bad and you should feel bad. /Zoidberg
 
I am a little worried about myself. I see that pic and go "wow, HOT!" but at the same time I was thinking... "WTF is up with that sweater?"
 
Lets skip the three medal-winning performances to show the yank who finished sixth.

Fucking homers.

I promise never to complain about CBC again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top