Former President Trump Thread



Wherein Trump sables down Bannon, says he never had any influence, had nothing to do with the Trump win and everything with the Alabama loss.

I look forward to Trump's reaction to other stuff from the book.
 


Wherein Trump sables down Bannon, says he never had any influence, had nothing to do with the Trump win and everything with the Alabama loss.

I look forward to Trump's reaction to other stuff from the book.
Two chimps at the zoo flinging poo at each other. Not even worth the time to stop and laugh.
 
I look forward to Trump's reaction to other stuff from the book.
His lawyer sent Bannon a cease-and-desist, accusing him of libel AND slander.

He sent a cease-and-desist to the publisher of this upcoming book, too. Apparently he thinks you can’t publish a book if it’s damaging to the president.

Also, cell phones are now banned in the West Wing. Period. For everyone, all the time. His Press Secretary is claiming it’s for “cyber security” but the staff is leaking to the press (ha!) that it’s just to prevent more damaging leaks that show how dysfunctional they all are.

THAT is the full reaction to the book.
 

fade

Staff member
I'm getting this serious Sith vibe from the whole Bannon/Trump thing.

Like the apprentice is invoking the Rule of 2 and rising up against his master
 
His lawyer sent Bannon a cease-and-desist, accusing him of libel AND slander.

He sent a cease-and-desist to the publisher of this upcoming book, too. Apparently he thinks you can’t publish a book if it’s damaging to the president.

Also, cell phones are now banned in the West Wing. Period. For everyone, all the time. His Press Secretary is claiming it’s for “cyber security” but the staff is leaking to the press (ha!) that it’s just to prevent more damaging leaks that show how dysfunctional they all are.

THAT is the full reaction to the book.
Also, apparently there was also a mention of Bannon breaking a NDA...
 

fade

Staff member
Well he does keep bumbling through everything, yet it all seems to work out for him in the end.
 
Also, cell phones are now banned in the West Wing. Period. For everyone, all the time. His Press Secretary is claiming it’s for “cyber security” but the staff is leaking to the press (ha!) that it’s just to prevent more damaging leaks that show how dysfunctional they all are.
I'd read that only PERSONAL cell phones are now banned. Government issued ones for employees are fine.

Personally I think that this is reasonable for a high security area, and I'm surprised that wasn't already the case. That itself is rather odd imo.

The rest I didn't quote is of course totally absurd to try and silence people like that.
 
Ok, assholes, give us SOURCES so we can look. You are both saying "I heard/read", which is a waste of our time.
Dude, language. As for source, CBS: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-bans-personal-cell-phone-use-from-west-wing/
The White House is instituting new policies on the use of personal cell phones in the West Wing in the wake of damaging reports of a chaotic Trump administration detailed in a new book.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders released the following statement on the policy change:

The security and integrity of the technology systems at the White House is a top priority for the Trump administration and therefore starting next week the use of all personal devices for both guests and staff will no longer be allowed in the West Wing. Staff will be able to conduct business on their government-issued devices and continue working hard on behalf of the American people.

CBS News' Mark Knoller reports that during the Obama administration, reporters were not allowed to bring personal devices into the Roosevelt Room.
 
Nope, it’s not my burden to prove your point, shit-lick.
I don’t know what crawled up your ass, but this isn’t the debate team. We’re talking about the news, not keeping score. I didn’t’t have a “point” and I’m not trying to convince anyone of anything. If you see us talk about something unfamiliar, be a big boy and go look it up.

And I also don’t know why you felt the need to start the name calling, but it was uncalled for. So knock it the fuck off.
 
That makes sense unless the place someone heard/read an item was social media. If Krisken puts it into Google and nothing pops up because one of us just read it on some crackpot's Twitter feed, wouldn't it make sense to ask where the info came from?
 
I was going to retort, but I just don’t care. This is why you guys are constantly quibbling over meaningless stuff and not the content.
 
Top