Everyday sexual harassment of women

I wish it was as simple as guys being too dumb to know the difference between "That's a cool hat" versus "Yeah, I'd fuck you." But it's not; when pressed, a lot of them don't even know why they do it. It's really just IRL trolling.
 
Not really.
Yeah, it really is. For so many reasons. Some of them being that people think it isn't. That says a lot about the culture we take in and find acceptable.[DOUBLEPOST=1409421081,1409421000][/DOUBLEPOST]
I wish it was as simple as guys being too dumb to know the difference between "That's a cool hat" versus "Yeah, I'd fuck you." But it's not; when pressed, a lot of them don't even know why they do it. It's really just IRL trolling.
I wouldn't call it trolling, I think it's people blind to the realization that the person they are addressing as a object for their own pleasure is as valuable a human as they are. Which is very problematic.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Yeah, it really is. For so many reasons. Some of them being that people think it isn't. That says a lot about the culture we take in and find acceptable.
"It's worse because many people think it isn't worse." That's circuitous logic at its best. Explain to me explicitly why a decal of a tied up woman is worse than a decal of a child about to get run over.
 
"It's worse because many people think it isn't worse." That's circuitous logic at its best. Explain to me explicitly why a decal of a tied up woman is worse than a decal of a child about to get run over.
You misunderstand, or more likely I didn't phrase it right. It's extra horrible because so many people have bought into a culture that views women as objects for men to use as they see fit (although they are generally oblivious to this, because of that little problem of privilege that I know you loathe) that they see something like that and can't see why it would be problematic (i.e. "Oh sure, it's in bad taste but it's not that bad").

I truly don't expect you to agree, but no amount of telling me how "it's not a big deal" is going to change the fact that that I see a very disturbing cultural problem this sort of thing and the reaction to it from a section of the male population exemplifies.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
And the follow up question should be, how much of this is nature and how much is nurture? If we raise men to be think differently, can they view women as people, even when those women are wearing bikinis? Or is it an inevitability of biology that showing a lot of skin will cause most men to think a certain way?

Personally, I hope, and largely suspect, that this is a case of nurture. We can change the way we think, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's easy, or simple.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
You misunderstand, or more likely I didn't phrase it right. It's extra horrible because so many people have bought into a culture that views women as objects for men to use as they see fit (although they are generally oblivious to this, because of that little problem of privilege that I know you loathe) that they see something like that and can't see why it would be problematic.
This implies that the viewer identifies with and approves the concept of the woman tied up, which I don't agree with. If anything, the creator of the decal chose to make it of a woman because he agrees with you - the decal would not have had the same jarring impact if it had depicted a man tied up, because of a long reinforced cultural trope of it being particularly villainous to victimize a woman, as opposed to a man - the man is expected to "be able to defend himself" in our cultural zeitgeist. Snidely Whiplash ties Nell to the tracks, not Dudley. A woman tied up in the back of a truck is reprehensible. An image of a woman tied up in the back of a truck is storytelling. Maybe it's a story you don't want to hear, but that does not make the author an oppressor of women.

To suggest otherwise is to claim someone, be it the creator or the viewer, is unable to distinguish fiction from reality, or is at least influenced by fiction to a great degree - the same argument that says violent video games cause school shootings.
 
How dare people have tools to keep themselves safe.
Heh. Now you're starting to sound like @GasBandit.
Epigenetics is mind blowing stuff.
It's the literal embodiment of nurture influencing Nature.
I wish it was as simple as guys being too dumb to know the difference between "That's a cool hat" versus "Yeah, I'd fuck you." But it's not; when pressed, a lot of them don't even know why they do it. It's really just IRL trolling.
Or a sign that some people haven't learned how to sublimate their id well enough to function in a polite society.

--Patrick
 
Pretty substantial article about the Sarkeesian thing over here.
There's a common trope of framing Sarkeesian's work as "cherry-picked", as she takes isolated examples from many games and presents them as a stream of misogyny in order to create the illusion that all of these games are entirely misogynist, the entire way through. That's a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is Sarkeesian is doing with TvsWVG, and what cultural criticism in general is. These are tropes - they're fragments of a whole. [...] In other words, Anita Sarkeesian only presents sections of games as sexist [in her videos] because she's only talking about the sexist bits of games, and how, of the tropes developers choose to put in their games when designing for female characters, they frequently fall back on sexist ones.
--Patrick
 

GasBandit

Staff member
Man, it saved the whammy for last.

MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.
FACTS
: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.
 
differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week.
once you take away all of male privilege, yeah, the wage gap is nothin' at all! whew, we cracked it!

also re: the fappening... you ever wonder why there's no celeb dick pics leaked yet??? hum.....
 
To be fair, there are multiple male celebrities who have had leaked nudes and/or sex tapes come out, such as Fred Durst, Bret Favre, and multiple politicians. The big difference being, women aren't actively seeking out these pictures for sexual gratification, rather the media itself is searching for them for the sheer sentimentalization of them.
 

GasBandit

Staff member
To be fair, there are multiple male celebrities who have had leaked nudes and/or sex tapes come out, such as Fred Durst, Bret Favre, and multiple politicians. The big difference being, women aren't actively seeking out these pictures for sexual gratification, rather the media itself is searching for them for the sheer sentimentalization of them.
It's almost as if the different genders tend to want different things as erotic stimuli. But that'd be crazy talk.
 
I never CAN tell...

Last time he agreed with me, I thought he was arguing with me.

My world is all topsy turvy when it happens.
 
Not due to the points she makes, but the way she makes them.
The persecuted have an unfortunate habit of asking for equality from the persecutor(s) but in actuality demanding retribution. That is, they aren't ever going to be happy until they've experienced the schadenfreude of watching their former oppressors suffer.
I am not accusing Sarkeesian of this (I have no real standing to do so, as I don't remember more than a few minutes of her videos), but this is a common enough feature of most things labeled as "critiques" that her videos have that quality ascribed to them prior to ever pressing the "play" button, and that colors the context and interpretation of the remainder.

--Patrick
 
Speaking from personal experience only, she seems much less polarizing among actual developers and and publishers than she is among the vocal section of her critics in the gaming community, even with those who don't agree with her entirely. No one really disagrees that there is a problem, they just disagree on its severity and the best way to deal with it (of note, almost all female developers/producers I've met say, "get more women in the industry into creative control and production, not just as code monkeys or artists or marketers").
 
Been wanting to comment on the whole Sarkeesian situation, but after writing up a long post I feel I got lost in my points and ultimately looked like a bit of a hypocrite.

All I will say is Sarkeesian has a right to her opinions or bringing knowledge about sexism in gaming. This is no reason to send her death threats. She does not deserve that.
 
The persecuted have an unfortunate habit of asking for equality from the persecutor(s) but in actuality demanding retribution. That is, they aren't ever going to be happy until they've experienced the schadenfreude of watching their former oppressors suffer.
I think that's a vocal fraction as opposed to an overall climate among persecuted groups.
 
Top