Video Game News and Miscellany

Ubisoft continues it's bitchy ex-girlfriend routine.

After parting ways with former Assassin's Creed designer Patrice Desilets, Ubisoft has indefinitely suspended development on 1666, CEO Yves Guillemot said today during an investor call for the company's 2012-13 earnings report.

"After more than two months of discussions with [Desilets], we couldn't align our vision both on project development and team management," said Guillemot, "so consequently our collaboration has ended, and we have suspended 1666 for an undisclosed period of time."
 
http://nickpiers.wordpress.com/2013/05/18/objectification-vs-idealization/

Wrote an article today after seeing the latest Annoyed Gamer episode on Game Trailers. I really don't agree with what he said, how men are just as objectified in video games as women. It's a strawman's argument that doesn't hold up because men are idealized for their target audience. It's something they want to be, not something they fantasize to be with. Ugh. This subject always gets me ranty.
 

figmentPez

Staff member
The "men are just as objectified" argument gives me the creeps.
Yeah, it kind of strikes me as like saying "there are just as many healthy options on McDonald's menu". There isn't much objectification of men in video games, the objectification that does exist* is tends to be more mild, and there's a huge lack of female characters that are well developed and not exploited.

*there certainly are some bishy characters in JRPGs, and other genres, that are tailored to be sex-objects for women. Relatively uncommon in video games as a whole, and usually not depowered just for a female to get to save, but there is some true objectification of men to be found out there, however mild in comparison to the outrageous objectification of women.
 
It's not even the sex object thing, it's the complete missing of the fact that sexism (just like racism) is about a power-dynamic. A dude in his underwear onscreen comes with a lot less gender-role baggage as a default position.
 
If you want to see objectification of men, look in shojo anime and manga. It's still not as bad or prolific as female objectification is in other media, but there is some stuff there that will definitely make guys more than a little uncomfortable. It still doesn't excuse what is happening in OUR culture ether.[DOUBLEPOST=1368920857][/DOUBLEPOST]
It's not even the sex object thing, it's the complete missing of the fact that sexism (just like racism) is about a power-dynamic. A dude in his underwear onscreen comes with a lot less gender-role baggage as a default position.
url.gif


Somehow even THIS seems like a power fantasy.
 
It was already mostly finished when THQ collapsed, so I'm happy that it managed to find a new home. I'm just disappointed that home is abusive.
Abusive because they are giving the Ranger mode as DLC? Damn dude. Thats a little... over the top. It's annoying but...

But actually, silly little thing I noticed, the version I've seen at 3 stores (and I bought one!) has the Ranger DLC included. So... ?

Anyway, the game is FAN-TASTIC. Buy this people. Buy it now.
 
Abusive because they are giving the Ranger mode as DLC? Damn dude. Thats a little... over the top. It's annoying but...

But actually, silly little thing I noticed, the version I've seen at 3 stores (and I bought one!) has the Ranger DLC included. So... ?

Anyway, the game is FAN-TASTIC. Buy this people. Buy it now.
That's only the launch shipment, which is the "Legendary Edition", I believe. Subsequent shipments will be normal editions and not have it included.
 
This is what I hate about the gaming industry : ignorant selfish gamers.

"Oh it doesn't affect me, so it's OK."

That's why this malpractice is slowly but surely becoming the norm. People should make a stand against any type of shenanigans like this, without fault, without hesitation.

There's no ME in these type of situations because if you do that, one day, sooner or later, you'll get Mass Effected 3.
 
I think there's conflict internally over whether to boycott the game for the distributor's shitty practices or whether to support the developers who went through hell to make the game. In most cases I would say not to buy it if you don't support the company's practices, but this is one of those situations where I think people don't want to punish the developer.

But what do I know? I have my list of game-makers who I try to always buy their games new to support them and then the others whose games I depend on others to buy and trade in to Gamestop so I can get them for $25-$35 less four months later. I'll buy a game here and there that I feel deserves it new. I kind of wish I'd bought XCOM: Enemy Unknown new, because I love it so much.

But it's easy for me to not give them money on Metro because I wasn't going to in the first place. There's only so much you can not spend.
 
I'd LOVE to see an HD remake of FFIX. My only real problem with that game is that it was at a time where the game textures were outpacing the rendering power of the system, resulting in the textures on the models looking like crap.
 
Now, admittedly it's been a while since I've played FF8, but those screenshots from the Kotaku article don't look any more HD to me than the original game.
You're thinking of "re-mastered". HD just means that it will look 1:1 on an HDTV instead of upscaled and slightly blurry. So it should look essentially the same, just maybe a little crisper on a per pixel basis.
 
You're thinking of "re-mastered". HD just means that it will look 1:1 on an HDTV instead of upscaled and slightly blurry. So it should look essentially the same, just maybe a little crisper on a per pixel basis.
Ah, I stand corrected.

Still though... I might get this for the nostalgia factor alone, assuming the price isn't crazy.
 
Maybe they shouldn't recycle old mediocre games and instead make new effort in reinventing their shit so their new games don't suck as much.
 
I think they said at some point that they didn't want to totally redo a game on that level because it'd look like they were creatively bankrupt.

Compared to what they're doing now I think that would have been the better option.[DOUBLEPOST=1369018007][/DOUBLEPOST]
I'd LOVE to see an HD remake of FFIX. My only real problem with that game is that it was at a time where the game textures were outpacing the rendering power of the system, resulting in the textures on the models looking like crap.
Also this, if they're going to redo any FF of the polygonal era, it should be VII or IX. They were easily the best of the PS1+ era.
 
I think they said at some point that they didn't want to totally redo a game on that level because it'd look like they were creatively bankrupt.

Compared to what they're doing now I think that would have been the better option.[DOUBLEPOST=1369018007][/DOUBLEPOST]

Also this, if they're going to redo any FF of the polygonal era, it should be VII or IX. They were easily the best of the PS1+ era.
I've said this before, and I know I'm in the minority, but I loved the hell out of FFVIII
 
I would blow a dick for a remastered Parasite Eve
I wouldn't mind them putting out an HD version, but I wouldn't want them to remaster it like the Gamecube remake of Resident Evil, because Square fucks up almost everything it touches. After playing The Third Birthday, it's clear Square's current misogynist head of development (whoever replaced Hironobu Sakaguchi) cannot do anything right.
 
Top